Report this comment
  • "Flimsiest of reasons and will go to appeal. When will summer St be sorted? When will Rodborough Fields be sorted? This is an endless list. Why is there never any debate about employment sites??? People live, people work. Not in Stroud - they live there but drive the car to work."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.

  • Enter the above word in the box below

Plans for 150 homes at Mankley Field thrown out by SDC

Plans for 150 homes at Mankley Field thrown out by SDC

Plans for 150 homes at Mankley Field thrown out by SDC

First published in News
Last updated
Stroud News and Journal: Photograph of the Author by , Reporter

CHEERS and celebrations met the announcement that Stroud District Council’s development control committee had thrown out controversial plans for 150 homes in Leonard Stanley.

At a meeting on Tuesday, March 11 all members of the committee voted against the application by developers Gladman to build on the site known locally as Mankley Field.

Although it had been recommended for approval by planning officers at SDC the committee members found new reasons for refusal and voted against the recommendation.

Councillor David Drew (Lab, Farmhill and Paganhill) proposed to refuse the application at the meeting based on the potential damage the development would do to the visual landscape of Leonard Stanley and King’s Stanley.

Cllr Drew also outlined the potential for harm that the development would do to the ‘social landscape’ of the area.

It would, he said, lead to a forced ‘coalescence between the two villages’ and also that the application ‘failed to show compliance with SDC’s emerging local plan’.

More than 100 objectors to the proposal attended the meeting and although the decision was met with delight, in reality applicants Gladman is most likely lodge an appeal against the refusal, according to Mankley Field Action Group chairman Diane Odell.

Speaking after the meeting, vice-chairman of the development control committee, John Marjoram, said members had spent a lot of time debating the refusal reasons.

“Personally I think we have robust refusal reasons and we are confident that we can hold our ground in the case of an appeal,” he said.

“If the committee’s decision is upheld at appeal then I think it would give councillors back their faith in the planning process.”

Gladman has not yet formally lodged an appeal against the decision.

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree