Witness: We pushed off the gate at around 3.20pm and were taxiing to runway four as the US Airways flight took off. I noticed firetrucks with lights on scrambling toward the end of the runway but didn't think much of it, since drills are carried out frequently.
Around 3.30pm, the ground controller frantically asked the rescue team what they had seen and the reply was vague: "He's in the water."
The controller then asked for clarification and the response was: "I lost the target, he's in the Hudson." At that point we knew an airplane had gone down.
My first assumption was that it might have been a general aviation aircraft that had run into trouble, but seconds later a query came on the radio: "What type was it?"
The answer was terrifying. "Airbus 319 or 320, Cactus." Cactus is US Airways' call sign. The LaGuardia ground frequency, usually bustling with calls, went completely silent.
In a very sombre tone of voice, about 10 minutes after it all happened, the controller announced that the Airbus had ingested a bird on take-off and gone down in the river.
Departures were stopped. The radio was silent as every pilot contemplated the fate of the US Airways crew and their passengers on such a frigid day with the typically bad odds of ditching an airliner.
We sat on the taxiway for the next 45 minutes, looking to our right at Manhattan and the direction of the crash wondering if anyone would make it out. All we could see were helicopters hovering over the scene.
A few minutes later, we tuned our low-frequency navigation radio to a local AM news station and began to hear the news that there were passengers in rafts and on the wings. We were astounded to later see pictures of the unscathed aircraft.
It was my leg to fly and take off from the same runway, and making the same left turns over the Hudson was very eerie. As we went over the area where the plane floated, we flew in silence. Mark Williams, a pilot with a US regional carrier, was waiting to take off at LaGuardia Airport as US Airways flight 1549 crashed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article