THE Stone of Destiny should be returned to its ancient home at Scone in Perthshire, according to a Tory MSP for the area.
The proposal comes nearly 10 years after the most recent Tory Scottish Secretary had it returned to Scotland from Westminster Abbey, where it had been for nearly 700 years.
Scottish Secretary Michael Forsyth believed it might help counter the widespread view that the Tory administration was anti-Scottish.
He had the stone returned to Edinburgh Castle on St Andrew's Day 1996, where it remains with the Scottish crown jewels.
Murdo Fraser, Tory deputy Scottish leader and list MSP for Mid-Scotland and Fife, said: "Scone Palace is the original home of the Stone of Destiny, where Scottish Kings were crowned. The stone is pivotal to the history of Scotland and the UK, and there is no historical, political, constitutional or economic reason for it to be in Edinburgh.
"Moving the stone to its rightful home in Scone would create a new tourist attraction in Perthshire and allow the stone to be exhibited in a context which properly explained its historical background and significance."
Westminster Abbey officials yesterday said they were content for the Stone of Destiny to be in Scotland, in the wake of reports that the decision to return it caused consternation among Church of England authorities.
A programme to be broadcast next week on BBC Radio Scotland reportedly quotes an honorary steward at the abbey as saying its Dean was "livid" with the decision to move it.
A spokesman for the abbey said the steward was airing a personal view. "A decade has passed now since the Stone of Scone was moved and the Dean and Chapter are content with the situation as it is, " the spokesman said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article