THE man accused of murdering drama student Amanda Duffy told
detectives he kissed and cuddled her the night she died, a court heard
yesterday.
However, Francis Auld, 20, denied that he was her killer and said
19-year-old Amanda had gone off with another man called Mark.
At the High Court in Glasgow, the jury listened to a lengthy tape
interview between detectives and Mr Auld.
He told them he and Amanda had been to the same school and that night
they had met by chance and ended up kissing and cuddling on a bench.
A dark-haired stranger had appeared on the scene, and shouted on
Amanda and Auld said he felt it better to leave.
Mr Auld, of Douglas Crescent, Eddlewood, Hamilton, denies murdering
Amanda, of Brackenhill Drive, Hamilton, on May 30 last.
It is alleged he assaulted the girl on waste ground at the town's
Miller Street car park, punched and kicked her, stamped on her face and
neck, removed parts of her clothing, forced pieces of wood into parts of
her body, and murdered her.
Detective Sergeant John Robertson, 45, told Mr John Morris,
prosecuting, that Mr Auld was detained on June 5 and taken to Hamilton
police office where his interview was taped.
During the long tape recording played to the jury, Mr Auld said he had
been out with a friend and his brother, gone to the pictures and had
about eight pints in a local bar.
He said later he was in the precinct in Quarry Street when he saw
Amanda and they were both a bit drunk and ended up sitting kissing on a
bench.
Then they walked up the precinct before there was shouting and Amanda
turned round and said: ''It's OK. It's Mark.'' She walked slowly towards
this man.
Detective Sergeant Robertson said that after the interview, Mr Auld
had been charged with murdering Amanda, replying: ''I didnae dae any of
that. I wisnae there that night in that car park.''
The trial before Lord Sutherland continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article