THE Maxwell ability to surprise reached a new height late last night
when both Kevin and Ian Maxwell resigned from the board of Mirror Group
Newspapers. That was after the revelation that there had been material
sums transferred from the newspaper company to the private Maxwell
interests.
The City had thought earlier in the day that the resignations of Kevin
and Ian from the board of Maxwell Communication Corporation was surprise
enough given the suspension of the shares of both MCC and MGN on Monday.
There had been rumours and rumblings of there being something far
adrift over the last few weeks including action being taken by some
representatives of MGN pensioners against the trustees of the pension
fund. There have been allegations of improper lending to private Maxwell
interests. These include a large amount of cash to MCC and other
investments, including some in Canada, altogether amounting to about
#30m, or 10%, of the MGN pension funds.
But after last night's sensational disclosure it seems inevitable that
MGN will be sold. That could take the form of either the straightforward
public offer for sale or else direct to a specific buyer. Over the last
few days there have been various suggestions but the most likely buyer
is Australian entrepreneur Kerry Packer.
Last weekend he dropped out of the bidding for the Fairfax newspaper
publishing group in Australia. It was thought he withdrew because it was
becoming increasingly obvious that the Mirror Group could soon be up for
sale.
Yesterday morning Kevin Maxwell said that the public part of the group
had lent money to the private part. At the same time he said his
resignation had nothing to do with the problems in the pension funds,
including that of the privately-owned AGB International market research
group. He refused to say whether the family-owned 51% stake in MGN was
up for sale or the 68% holding in MCC.
In a complete volte face last night, he totally contradicted his
earlier statement about his and his brother's resignations.
It was very surprising that Ian did not stand down from MGN at the
same time as Kevin resigned from MCC. But there always had been a
suspicion that MGN had not been fully ''ring-fenced'' within the Maxwell
empire despite the protestations and verbal guarantees given by the late
Robert Maxwell at the time of the MGN flotation. In the past the
suspicion had been that there was a liberal and secretive flow of funds
and assets within the Maxwell organisation.
Robert Maxwell was at times not over-careful about the niceties of
company law as borne out by the highly-critical Department of Trade
investigation into the affairs of Pergammon Press in the early
seventies.
Since the flotation of MGN this summer there has not been a financial
report or results submitted to the Stock Exchange, so it is difficult to
assess whether or not there has been a drain of funds from MGN
elsewhere. However, MGN pensioners have been taking action against the
trustees of the pension fund alleging inappropriate investments.
The private debts of the Maxwell family are now understood to exceed
#1000m. In addition, MCC, which is changing its name to Macmillan, the
name of its major asset in the form of the US publishing house, has
debts of between #1100m and #1400m.
Kevin Maxwell, in a prepared statement, said that it was in the best
interests of the company's shareholders and employees that he and Ian
step down with immediate effect from MCC.
The 30 banks, where the five-member steering committee is led by
National Westminster's John Melbourn, had agreed to maintain their
standstill position on loans until Friday to allow the Maxwells to come
up with an acceptable solution to the debt problem. But obviously there
must be considerable confusion this morning as to what will happen next.
Almost certainly some banks which had originally agreed to a
standstill on loan repayments until December 20 may well want to press
their own claims, particularly if they are not substantial in the
overall context.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article