‘Incinerator health impact underestimated’ says scientific expert

THE potential threat to public health from the planned incinerator at Javelin Park has been underestimated, according to a scientific expert.


Professor Vyvyan Howard, a toxico-pathologist at the University of Ulster, has said that public concern over the health impact from the proposed facility is 'understandable and justified'.


The medically qualified academic, who has researched the effects of pollutants on infants and unborn babies, was commissioned by protest group GlosVAIN to produce a report on Javelin Park.
 

In his report, Prof Howard says the threat posed specifically by PM2.5 particles has been underestimated.


GlosVAIN now intend to submit his report as evidence to Gloucestershire County Council's planning committee, which is likely to decide in the next few months whether or not to approve the plant.
 

GCC has repeatedly highlighted the Health Protection Agency's current position, which is that 'well-run and regulated modern municipal waste incinerators are not a significant risk to public health'.


A spokesman for Urbaser Balfour Beatty (UBB) - the company hoping to build the plant - said: "Strict and highly regulated operating procedures and controls will ensure that the facility does not have an adverse impact on human health.


"Energy from waste facilities are regulated in England and Wales by the Environment Agency, and there are over 350 operating across Europe.
 

"The facility will incorporate bag filters which are the best available technology, and are effective at removing particles from the plant's emissions."
 

However, GlosVAIN spokesman Ian Richens, said: "Given the conclusions reached in Professor Howard's report that PM2.5 emissions appear to be considerably underestimated we should all be genuinely concerned.


"We all remember that in the 1970s asbestos was presented as posing no danger to our health  - let us not make the same mistake again."


A GCC spokesman said: "The issues of air quality and the proposed energy from waste facility at Javelin Park will be considered by both the planning authority and the Environment Agency as they will determine UBB's applications for planning permission and an environmental permit respectively."

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:22pm Wed 10 Oct 12

green4go says...

GCC & their hired man Prof Harrison, the HPA and UBB all rely on the presumption that 'improved' filtering necessarily means reduced emission particles. Put simply, the evidence Prof Howard refers to is that the finer particles still get through and these are the ones that do the most damage. The HPA have commissioned a study and its outcome should be awaited.
GCC & their hired man Prof Harrison, the HPA and UBB all rely on the presumption that 'improved' filtering necessarily means reduced emission particles. Put simply, the evidence Prof Howard refers to is that the finer particles still get through and these are the ones that do the most damage. The HPA have commissioned a study and its outcome should be awaited. green4go

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree