Plans for parental contact unveiled

Children's minister Tim Loughton stressed that the change would not give parents a right to equal time with children

Children's minister Tim Loughton stressed that the change would not give parents a right to equal time with children

First published in National News © by

New Government proposals published will strengthen children's rights to maintain contact with both parents following separation or divorce.

Under the proposals, family courts in England and Wales will be required to work on the presumption that the child's welfare is best served by remaining involved with both parents, unless the evidence shows it would be unsafe or not in the child's best interest.

But children's minister Tim Loughton stressed that the change would not give parents a right to equal time with children or impose upon courts any prescribed notion of the appropriate division of time between father and mother.

The move comes in spite of a warning in last year's Norgrove Report on family justice that the creation of a legal presumption in favour of shared parenting would create an "unacceptable risk of damage to children".

Tougher fines and jail sentences could also be imposed on parents who breach court orders regarding care arrangements.

Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg said: "Both parents have a responsibility and a role to play in their children's upbringing and we want to make sure that, when parents separate, the law recognises that.

"Children should have the benefit of contact with both of their parents through an ongoing relationship with them. This is why we are publishing proposals today setting out that, where it is safe and in the child's best interest, the law is clear that both parents share responsibility in their upbringing."

Launching a consultation on the proposals, Mr Loughton said that, in the majority of cases, separating parents should resolve disputes about their children without going to court at all.

But he added: "We must improve the system where court cannot be avoided - where disputes are intractable or complex or children's welfare is at risk.

"We need to clarify and restore public confidence that the courts fully recognise the joint nature of parenting."

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

2:38am Wed 13 Jun 12

Gordon Clifton says...

The UK ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child on 16 December 1991. Article 9 gives children the right to stay in contact with both parents. It has taken successive UK governments nearly 21 years to give Article 9 the force of law so shame on all of them.

Meanwhile we continue to lecture other countries on human rights.

Social workers in this country will have to wake up and take note too. They have been part of the conspiracy against children when, for example, they wilfully refuse to exercise their influence on parents under their supervision who bar a child's access to its other parent even when a contact order is in place. Enabling the breach of Article 9, or any other Article, is self-evidently child abuse. Social workers prefer to see a parent go to court for the enforcement of a contact order with the inevitable months of delay. Where this is under legal aid it will cost the public purse £5,000 - £10,000. Thus the refusal of social workers to exercise influence enables and prolongs the abuse of a child and costs taxpayers up to £10,000.This at a time when child abuse is on the increase everywhere and the public finances are under severe strain. It beggars belief!
The UK ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child on 16 December 1991. Article 9 gives children the right to stay in contact with both parents. It has taken successive UK governments nearly 21 years to give Article 9 the force of law so shame on all of them. Meanwhile we continue to lecture other countries on human rights. Social workers in this country will have to wake up and take note too. They have been part of the conspiracy against children when, for example, they wilfully refuse to exercise their influence on parents under their supervision who bar a child's access to its other parent even when a contact order is in place. Enabling the breach of Article 9, or any other Article, is self-evidently child abuse. Social workers prefer to see a parent go to court for the enforcement of a contact order with the inevitable months of delay. Where this is under legal aid it will cost the public purse £5,000 - £10,000. Thus the refusal of social workers to exercise influence enables and prolongs the abuse of a child and costs taxpayers up to £10,000.This at a time when child abuse is on the increase everywhere and the public finances are under severe strain. It beggars belief! Gordon Clifton
  • Score: 0
Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree